How do chronically ill patients evaluate their medical care? An observational study with 46919 patients in 676 primary care practices of direct relevance to person-centered medicine

Article Sidebar

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (USD 25)
Published: Jun 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v1i2.75

Main Article Content

Katja Goetz
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
Stephen Campbell
University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany and National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Justin Rochon
AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany
Anja Klingenberg
AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany
Joachim Szecsenyi
Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany and of AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany

Abstract

Objectives: Patients’ evaluation of medical care presents an essential dimension within the quality of care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an association exists between patients’ self-reported chronic conditions and their evaluation of medical care.Method: Study participants included 46919 patients from 676 primary care practices in Germany who completed the EUROPEP questionnaire consisting of 23 items with 5 dimensions: “Relationship and communication”, “medical care”, “information and support”, “continuity and cooperation”, and “availability and accessibility”. The primary outcome measure was the presence of a self-reported chronic condition (yes vs. no). Unpaired t-tests were used to test for differences between patients with and without chronic conditions with respect to EUROPEP items. Furthermore, a log-binomial regression model on patients’ self-reported chronic conditions was calculated.Results: Survey respondent rate was 92.5%. Over 45.6% of patients reported having a chronic condition. In general, patients with and without chronic conditions evaluated their care as positive. Self-reported chronic conditions were associated with two items from “relationship and communication”, two items from “medical care”, and one item from “facilities availability and accessibility”. Items from “information and support” and “continuity and cooperation” were not associated with self-reported chronic conditions.Conclusions: The study confirmed a high level of patients’ evaluation of medical care provided by general practices and that while patients with a self-reported chronic condition report generally higher satisfaction, this is not the case for all aspects of care. The results are important for understanding patients’ priorities with regard to general practice care and are advanced as major contributions to the development of person-centered medicine.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2011): June
Section
Regular Articles
Author Biographies

Katja Goetz, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Research Assistant, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany   

Stephen Campbell, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany and National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Senior Research Assistant, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany and National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK    

Justin Rochon, AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany

Research Assistant AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany   

Anja Klingenberg, AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany

Research Assistant  AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany

Joachim Szecsenyi, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany and of AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany

Head of Department, Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany and of AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Göttingen, Germany    

References

. Dowd, B.E., Kralewski, J.E., Kaissu, A.A. and Irrgang, S.J. (2009). Is patient satisfaction influenced by the intensity of medical resource use by their physicians? American Journal of Managed Care 15(5), e16-e21.

. Campbell, S.M., Kontopantelis, K., Reeves, D., Valderas, J.M., Gaehl, E., Small, N. and Roland, M.O. (2010). Changes in patient experiences of primary care during health service reforms in England between 2003 and 2007. Annals of Family Medicine 8 (6), 499-506.

. Rahmqvist, M. and Bara, A.C. (2010). Patient characteristics and quality dimensions related to patient satisfaction. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 22 (2), 86-92.

. Vingerhoets, E., Wensing, M. and Grol, R. (2001). Feedback of patients’ evaluation of general practice care: a randomised trial. Quality in Health Care 10 (4), 224-228.

. Marcinowicz., L. Chlabicz, S and Grebowski, R. (2010). Understanding patient satisfaction with family doctor care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16, 712-715.

. Williams, B., Coyle, J. and Healy, D. (1998). The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Social Science & Medicine 47 (9), 1351-1359.

. Xiao, H. and Barber, J. (2008). The effect of perceived health status on patient satisfaction. Value in Health 11 (4), 719-725.

. Campbell, S.M., Roland, M.O. and Buetow, S.A. (2000). Definition quality of care. Social Science & Medicine 51 (11), 1611-1625.

. Cheraghi-Sohi, S., Hole, A.R., Mead, N., McDonald, R., Whalley, D., Bower, P. and Roland M. (2008). What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients’ priorities. Annals of Family Medicine 6 (2), 107-115.

. Haggerty, J.L., Reid, R.J., Freeman, G.K., Starfield, B.H., Adair, C.E. and McKendry, R. (2003). Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. British Medical Journal 327 (7425), 1219-1221.

. Dennis, S.M., Zwar, N., Griffiths, R., Roland, M., Hasan, I., Powell Davies, G. and Harris M. (2008). Chronic disease management in primary care: from evidence to policy. Medical Journal of Australia 188 (8 Suppl), S53-S56.

. Turner, D., Tarrant, C., Windridge, K., Bryan, S., Boulton, M., Freeman, G. and Baker, R. (2007). Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments. Journal of Health Service Research and Policy 12 (3), 132-137.

. Wensing, M., Grol, R., Asberg, J., van Montfort, P., van Weel, C. and Felling, A. (1997). Does the health status of chronically ill patients predict their judgments of quality of care. Quality of Life Research 6 (4), 293-299.

. Stokes, T., Tarrant, C., Mainous, A.G., Schers, H., Freeman, G. and Baker, T. (2005). Continuity of care: Is the personal doctor still important? A survey of general practitioners and family physicians in England and Wales, the United States and the Netherlands. Annals of Family Medicine 3 (4), 353-359.

. Allan, J., Schattner, P. and Stocks, N., et al. (2009). Does patient satisfaction of general practice change over a decade? BMC Family Practice 10, 13.

. Engels, Y., Dautzenberg, M. and Campbell, S., et al. (2006). Testing a European set of indicators for the evaluation of the management of primary care practices. Family Practice 23 (1), 137-147.

. Grol, R. and Wensing, M. (2000). Patients evaluate general/family practice: The EUROPEP instrument. Nijmegen: World Organisation of Family Doctors (WONCA)/European Association for Quality in Family Practice.

. Grol, R., Wensing, M. and Mainz, J., et al. (2000). Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison. British Journal of General Practice 50 (460), 882-887.

. Vedsted, P., Sokolowski, I. and Heje, H.N. (2008). Data quality and confirmatory factor analysis of the Danish EUROPEP questionnaire on patient evaluation of general practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 26 (4), 174-180.

. Vedsted, P. and Heje, H.N. (2008). Association between patients’ recommendation of their GP and their evaluation of the GP. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 26 (4), 228-234.

. Anderson, R.T., Camacho, F.T. and Balkrishnan, R. (2007). Willing to wait? The influence of patient wait time on satisfaction with primary care. BMC Health Service Research 7, 31.

. Zapka, J.G., Palmer, R.H., Hargraves, J.L., Nerenz, D., Frazier, H.S. and Warner, C.K. (1995). Relationships of patient satisfaction with experience of system performance and health status. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 18 (1), 73-83.

. Jayasinghe, U.W., Proudfoot, J., Holton, C., Davies, G.P., Amoroso, C., Bubner, T., Beilby, J. and Harris, M.F. (2008). Chronically ill Australians’ satisfaction with accessibility and patient-centredness. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 20 (2), 105-114.

. Infante, F.A., Proudfoot, J.G., Powell Davies, G., Bubner, T.K., Holton, C.H., Beilby, J.J. and Harris, M.F. (2004). How people with chronic illnesses view their care in general practice: a

qualitative study. The Medical Journal of Australia 181 (2), 70-73.

. Saultz, J.W. and Albedaiwi, W. (2004). Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Annals of Family Medicine 2 (5), 445-451.

. Carlsen, B. and Aakvik, A. (2006). Patient involvement in clinical decision making: the effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction. Health Expectations 9 (2), 148-157.

. Cox, K., Britten, N., Hooper, R. and White, P. (2007). Patients’ involvement in decisions about medicines: GPs’ perceptions of their preferences. The British Journal of General Practice 57 (543), 777-784.

. Joosten, E.A., DeFuentes-Merillas, L., de Weert, G.H., Sensky, T., van der Staak, C.P.F. and de Jong, C.A.J. (2008). Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 77 (4), 219-226.

. Heje, H.N., Vedsted, P., Sokolowski, I. and Olesen, F. (2008). Patient characteristics associated in patients’ evaluation of their general practitioner. BMC Health Service Research 8, 178.

Coutinho, L.M.S., Scazufca, M. and Menezes, P.R. (2008). Methods for estimating prevalence ratios in cross-sectional studies. Revista de Saúde Pública 42 (6), 1-6.