Main Article Content

Chandramani Thuraisingham
Sivalingam Nalliah
Davendralingam Sinniah


A chaperone is encouraged to be present in any medical consultation especially when an intimate examination is required. This impartial attendant could be reassuring to the patient especially when gender is an issue and avoids any perceived conflict that may arise in the patient-physician relationship. Situations in which a chaperone is not available or declined by the patient present unique ethical problems and need to be avoided. When a chaperone is declined doctors are in a dilemma in proceeding with an intimate examination. This critical discussion explores the noble relationship between doctor and patient and how circumstances may change when both parties independently or otherwise deviate from established guidelines in affording treatment to the patient. 

Article Details

Regular Articles


.Bowman D. Guidelines on gynaecological examinations: ethico-legal perspectives and

challenges. Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2005;15(5):348-352.

.Yanikkerem E, Özdemir M, Bingol H, Tatar A, Karadeniz G. Women's attitudes and

expectations regarding gynaecological examination. Midwifery. 2009;25(5):500-508.

. Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 [Internet]. 2016 [cited 13

August 2016]. Available from:

. GMC: Intimate examinations and chaperones (2013) [Internet]. 2016

[cited 13 August 2016]. Available from:

. Garden G. Physical examination in psychiatric practice. Advances in Psychiatric

Treatment. 2005;11(2):142-9.

. Loizides S, Kallis A, Oswal A, Georgiou P, Kallis G, Gavalas M. Chaperone policy

in accident and emergency departments: a national survey. Journal of Evaluation in

Clinical Practice. 2010; 16(1):107-10.

. chaperones-to-reduce-risk.

. Moores K, Metcalfe N, Pring D. Chaperones and intimate physical examinations:

consultant practice and views on chaperones. Clinical Governance: An Intl J.


. Kay A. Policy review and analysis of chaperoning intimate medical examination

[Internet]. 2016 [cited August 2016].

Available from:

.The importance of clear sexual boundaries in the patient-doctor relationship: A

guide for patients [Internet]. 1st ed. New Zealand; 2016 [cited August 2016].

Available from: Publications/Booklets/sexual-boundaries-a-guide-for-patients.pdf

. requirement/[cited August 2016].

. Australian Medical Association. Patient examination guidelines 2012. Australia;

.[cited August 2016].

. Medical Board of Australia. Independent review on chaperoning [Internet]. 2016 [cited August 2016]. Available from:



. Code of medical ethics. 41st Annual General Meeting. 2001. [cited August 2016].

. Newton D, Fairley C, Teague R, Donovan B, Bowden F, Bilardi J et al. Australian

sexual health practitioners' use of chaperones for genital examinations: a survey of

attitudes and practice. Sexual Health. 2007;4(2):95.

. Rogstad K. Chaperones: protecting the patient or protecting the doctor? Sexual

Health. 2007;4(2):85.

. Baber J, Davies S, Dayan L. An extra pair of eyes: do patients want a chaperone

when having an anogenital examination?. Sexual Health. 2007;4(2):89.

. Yook H, Jang K, Lee H. Chaperone: For or Against Doctors. Yonsei Medical

Journal. 2009;50(4):599. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.4.599

. Whitford D, Karim M, Thompson G. Attitudes of patients towards the use of

chaperones in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;51(466):381-383.

. Dhai A, Gardner J, Guidozzi Y, Howarth G, Vorster M. Professionalism and the

intimate examination - are chaperones the answer?. South African Medical Journal.


. Al-Gaai EHammami M. Medical chaperoning at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi

Arabia: survey of physicians. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2009;35(12):729-732.

. Afaneh I, Sharma V, McVey R, Murphy C, Geary M. The use of a chaperone in

obstetrical and gynaecological practice. Irish medical journal [Internet]. 2010 [cited

August 2016];103(5):137-139. Available from:

. Schmittdiel J, Selby J, Grumbach K, Quesenberry C. Women's provider preferences

for basic gynecology care in a large health maintenance organization. Journal of

Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine. 1999;8(6):825-833.

. Ekeroma AHarillal M. Women's choice in the gender and ethnicity of her

obstetrician and gynaecologist. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of

Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003;43(5):354-359.

. Baker R, Mulka O, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Sinfield P, Costin N. Patients’ views on

and professionals’ use of chaperones during intimate examinations in primary health

care: a review. Quality in Primary Care [Internet]. 2007 [cited August

;15:337-344. Available from: on-and-professionals-use-of-chaperones-during-intimate-examinations-in-primary-health-care-a-review.pdf

. Stern V. Gynaecological examinations post-Ledward-a private matter. The Lancet.


. Toulany A, Katzman D, Goldberg E, Matlow A, Kaufman M. Chaperoning

adolescents: a bygone era or modern medical necessity?. Paediatrics & Child Health

[Internet]. 2012 [cited 5 September 2016];17(6):305-306. Available from:

. Teague R, Newton D, Fairley C, Hocking J, Pitts M, Bradshaw C et al. The

Differing Views of Male and Female Patients Toward Chaperones for Genital

Examinations in a Sexual Health Setting. Sexually Transmitted Diseases.


. Osmond M, Copas A, Newey C, Edwards S, Jungmann E, Mercey D. The use of

chaperones for intimate examinations: the patient perspective based on an

anonymous questionnaire. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2007;18(10):667-

. Santen S, Seth N, Hemphill R, Wrenn K. Chaperones for rectal and genital

examinations in the emergency department: what do patients and physicians want?. Southern Medical Journal. 2008;101(1):24-28.

. Gillon R. Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ.


. Henningsen D, Braz M, Davies E. Why do we flirt? flirting motivations and sex

differences in working and social contexts. Journal of Business Communication.


. Farris C, Treat T, Viken R, McFall R. Sexual coercion and the misperception of

sexual intent. Clinical Psychology Review. 2008;28(1):48-66.

doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.03.002

. GMC: ending your professional relationship with a patient (2013) [Internet]. 2016 [cited 5 September 2016]. Available from:


. Lee R, Melhado T, Chacko K, White K, Huebschmann A, Crane L. The dilemma of

disclosure: patient perspectives on gay and lesbian providers. Journal of General

Internal Medicine. 2007;23(2):142-147.

. Klitzman RGreenberg J. Patterns of communication between gay and lesbian

patients and their health care providers. Journal of Homosexuality. 2002;42(4):65-

. Riordan D. Interaction strategies of lesbian, gay, and bisexual healthcare

practitioners in the clinical examination of patients: qualitative study. BMJ.


. Shawn Tracy C, Upshur R. The medical chaperone: outdated anachronism or

modern necessity? Southern Medical Journal. 2008;