Patterns of and Copying with Cyberbullying in Croatia

Article Sidebar

Requires Subscription or Fee PDF (USD 25)
Published: May 20, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v4i4.489
Keywords:
Cyberbullying Children Facebook Cybervictims Social networks Abusive behavior

Main Article Content

Gordana Buljan Flander
Associate Professor, Psychologist, Child Protection Center of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Domagoj Stimac
Psychiatrist, Child Protection Center of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
Ella Selak Bagaric
Maks Vinscak

Abstract

Aims. Children’s online activities can result in serious consequences in their offline lives. Although Facebook is one of the biggest and most popular social networks in the world, there is little scientific research on cyberbullying via this social network because it is a new phenomenon. This study had the aim of examining children's behavior and experiences of violence on the Facebook social network. This seems to be the first research on cyberbullying on social networks in Croatia.Methods. Data presented in this paper were collected as part of an extensive research project conducted in 2013 by NGO Brave Phone and The Child Protection Center of Zagreb. The sample consisted of 1,489 children in Croatia aged 11 to 18 in rural and urban areas that completed the Scale of Victimization on Facebook and Scale of Committing Violence via Facebook.Results. Our results show that the average age when cyberbullying is most prevalent is between the ages of 15 and 16. In the overall sample, 12.1% of them experience abuse on Facebook, while 9.6% of them are abusive. The analysis of the children who were involved in  abuse on Facebook in any way, showed that 44.4% of them experienced abuse, 29.7% showed abusive behavior, while 25.9% of children both experienced abuse and were abusive on Facebook. Victims are mostly girls (60%), while boys commit cyberbullying more often (62%). Also,  58% of mixed cybervictims and cyberbullies are boys.Discussion. The results of prevalence of cyberbullying in our study are similar to those of previous population based studies. It is important to point out that although the prevalence of bullying was high; it is mostly a rare experience for the majority of children.Conclusions. Cyberbullying is a serious and growing problem and the academic community has to continue with the extensive research and development of practical prevention and intervention programs. Future research aimed at examining methods of coping with negative experiences on the Internet is necessary and there is a strong need for more research considering coping strategies of adolescents struggling with cyber victimization.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 4 No. 4 (2014)
Section
Regular Articles

References

. Dehue, F. (2013). Cyberbullying research: New perspectives and alternative methodologies. Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 23: 1–6.

. Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 49(2): 147-154.

. Accordino, D., & Accordino, M. (2011). An exploratory study of face-to-face and cyberbullying in sixth grade students. American Secondary Education. 40(1): 14-30.

. Ybarra, M., Boyd, D., Korchmaros, J., & Oppenheim, J. (2012). Defining and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization. Journal of Adolescent Health. 51(1): 53-58.

. Price, M., & Dalgleish, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Experiences, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young people. Youth Studies Australia. 29: 51-59.

. Lindfors, P. L., Kaltiala-Heino R., Arja H., & Rimpelä, A. H. (2012). Cyberbullying among Finnish adolescents –a population-based study. BMC Public Health. 12: 1027.

. Patchin, J. W. & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. 4(2): 148-169.

. Ybarra, M., Espelage, D. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2007). The co-occurrence of internet harassment and unwanted sexual solicitation victimization and perpetration: associations with psychosocial indicators. Journal of Adolescent Health. 4: 31–41.

. Heirman, W., & Walrave, M. (2008). Assessing concerns and issues about the mediation of technology in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology. 2(2): 1-11.

. Campbell, M., Spears, B., Slee, P., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2012). Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimization. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties. 17(3-4): 389-401.

. Joiner, T. E., & Rudd, M. D. (1996). Disentangling the inter-relations between hopelessness, loneliness, and suicidal ideation. Suicide & Life Threatening Behavior, 26 (1), 19-26.

. Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpela, A. (2000). Bullying at school--an indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23(6): 661-674.

. Hawker, D., & Boulton, M. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 41, 441-455.

.Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of

Suicide Research, 14(3): 206‐221.

. Šleglova, V., & Cerna, A. (2011). Cyberbullying in adolescent victims: Perception and coping. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 5(2)

. http://www.internetworldstats.com

. Vandebosch, H., & Cleemput, V. K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media Society. 11(8): 1349–1371.

. Cassidy, W., Jackson, M., & Brown, K. (2009). Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students’ experiences with cyber-bullying. School Psychology International, 30(4), 383-402.

. Patchin J., W., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Cyberbullying and self-esteem. Journal of School Health, 80(12), 614-621.

. Wang J., Iannotti R. J., & Nansel T. R. (2009) School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal Adolescent Health, 45: 368–375.

. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Olafsson, K. (2010). Members of the EU Kids Online network: Risks and safety of European children. Initial findings from EU Online survey of 9–16year olds and their parents. Available at: http://www2.lse.ac.uk/ media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/Initial_findings_report.pdf.

. Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computing Human Behaviour. 26: 277–287.

. Sourander A., Brunstein Klomek A., Ikonen M., Lindroos J., Luntamo T., Koskelainen M., Ristkari T. M., & Helenius H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: a population-based study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 67: 720–728.

. Wang J., Nansel T. R., & Iannotti R. J. (2011) Cyber and traditional bullying: differential association with depression. Journal of Adolescent Health. 48: 415–417.

. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Online victimization: 5 years later. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.

. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior. 29(2): 129-156.

. Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International. 27(2): 157-170.

. Williams, K. R. & Guerra, N. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health 41: 14 –21.

. Kowalski, R. M. & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health. 41(1): 22–30.

. Wade, A., & Beran, T. (2011). Cyberbullying: The new era of bullying. The Canadian Journal of School Psychology. 26(1): 44-61.