The Working in Healthcare Questionnaire: collaboration and support in clinical working as a means of quality improvement and creasing person-centered care

Main Article Content

Margaret Redshaw
Colin R. Martin

Abstract

Objective: To test the validity, reliability and discriminating capacity of an instrument to measure support, collaboration and communication in clinical working.Study setting: National Health Service organisations providing maternity care in England.Design: Validation study. Participants: Health professionals working in maternity care (177 doctors and 1991 midwives). Data collection: On-line questionnaire in organisations providing maternity care in 2007.Main outcome measure: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identifying factors making up the Working in Healthcare measure (WHQ)Principal findings: Marked differences were found between the professional groups in their perceptions of the working environment: medical staff were more likely to feel supported and engaged and midwifery staff less likely to be positive about collaborative working. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two factor structure for the Working in Healthcare Questionnaire (WHQ) with a 9-item version of the measure. Two factors represented by sub-scales ‘support and encouragement’ and ‘communication in practice’, were supported by confirmatory factor analysis.Conclusion: The study shows that the WHQ-9 is a valid, reliable and discriminating self-report measure of clinical working, reflecting the work experience and perceptions of healthcare staff, which could be used to monitor change over time and to support quality improvement and person-centered care.

Article Details

Section
Health Profession Issues

References

Konteh, F.H., Mannion, R. & Davies, H.T. (2011). Understanding culture and culture management in the English NHS: a comparison of professional and patient perspectives. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (1) 111-117.

Davies, H., Nutley, S.M. & Mannion, R. (2000). Organisational culture and quality of health care. Quality in Health Care 9, 111-119.

Scott,,T., Mannion, R., Davies, H. & Marshall, M. (2003). The Quantitative Measurement of Organizational Culture in Health Care: A Review of the Available Instruments. Health Service Research 38 (3) 923–945.

Mannion, R., Davies, H. & Marshall, M. (2005). Impact of star performance ratings in English acute hospital trusts. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 10, 18-24.

Mannion, R., Konteh, F. & Davies, H. (2009). Assessing organisational culture for quality and safety improvement: a national survey of tools and tool use. Quality and Safety in Health Care 18, 153-156.

Care Quality Commission. (2009). Supporting briefing note: issues highlighted by the 2009 NHS staff survey in England. London: Care Quality Commission.

Kivimäki, M. & Elovainio, M. (1999). A short version of the Team Climate Inventory: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 72, 241-246.

Ouwens, M., Hulscher, M., Akkermans, R., Hermens, R., Grol, R. & Wollersheim, H. (2008). The Team Climate Inventory: application in hospital teams and methodological considerations. Quality and Safety in Health Care 17, 275-280.

Strating, M.M. & Nieboer, A.P. (2010). Norms for creativity and implementation in healthcare teams: testing the group innovation inventory. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 22, 275-282.

Healthcare Commission. (2008). Towards better births: a review of maternity services in England. London: Healthcare Commission.

West, R. (1991). Computing for Psychologists. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood

Kline, P. (2000). A Psychometrics Primer. London: Free Association Books.

Hazlett-Stevens, H., Ullman, J.B. & Craske, M.G. (2004). Factor structure of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: examination of a method factor. Assessment 11, 361-370.

Jomeen, J. & Martin, C.R. (2007). Assessment and relationship of sleep quality to depression in early pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 25, 87-99.

Karimova, G. & Martin, C.R. (2003). A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale during pregnancy. Psychology, Health and Medicine 8, 89-103.

Martin, C.R. & Thompson, D.R. (2000). A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in coronary care patients following acute myocardial infarction. Psychology, Health and Medicine 5, 193-201.

Muthen, L.K. & Muthen, B.O. (2004). Mplus Users Guide. Los Angeles, C.A.

Bentler, P.M. & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariate structures. Psychological Bulletin 88, 588-606.

Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107, 238-246.

Tucker, L.R. & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38, 110.

Bollen, K.A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research 17, 303-316.

Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. New York: Guilford.

Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R. & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin 103, 391-410.

Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In: Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues and Applications. (Hoyle, R.H. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hu, L.T. & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling 6, 1-55.

Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. pp. 136-162. In: Testing Structural Equation Models.(Bollen, K.A. & Long, J.S. eds.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Schumaker, R.E. & Lomax, R.G. (1996). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modelling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Payne, R. & Firth-Cozens, J. (1999). Stress in health professionals: Psychological and organisational causes and interventions. Oxford: Wiley.

Arnetz, B. (1999). Staff perception of the impact of healthcare transformation on quality of care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 11, 345-351.

Leape, L., Berwick, D., Clancy, C., Conway, J., Gluck, P., Guest, J., Lawrence, D., Morath, J., O'Leary, D., O'Neill, P., Pinakiewicz, D. & Isaac, T. (2009). Transforming healthcare: a safety imperative. Quality and Safety in Health Care 18, 424-428.

Fagin, C.M. (1992). Collaboration between nurses and physicians: no longer a choice. Academic Medicine

(5) 295–303.

Makary, M.A., Sexton, J.B., Freischlag, J.A., Holzmueller, C.G., Millman, E.A., Rowen, L. & Pronovost, P.J. (2006). Operating room teamwork among physicians and nurses: teamwork in the eye of the beholder. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 202 (5) 746–752.