Problems of transparent medical risk communication using the example of mammography screening
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
References
Birnbacher, D., Wagner, B. (2003). Risiko. In: Bioethik. Eine Einführung (ed. M. Düwell, K. Steigleder), pp. 435-446. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Hansson, S. O. (1996). What is philosophy of risk? Theoria 62, 169-186.
Brock, D. W. (1993). Life and death. Philosophical essays in biomedical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Angell M. (2008). Industry-sponsored clinical research.A broken system. Journal of the American Medical Association 300, 1069-1071.
Braddock, C. H., Edwards, K. A., Hasenberg, N. M., Laidley, T. L. & Levinson, W. (1999). Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. Journal of the American Medical Association 282, 2313-2320.
Breitsameter, C. (2009). Individualisierte Perfektion. Vom Wert der Werte. Paderborn: Schöningh.
Breitsameter, C. (2010). Medical decision making and communication of risks – an ethical perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics36, 349-352.
Brock, D. W. (1993). Life and death. Philosophical essays in biomedical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brody, H. (2005). The company we keep: why physicians should refuse to see pharmaceutical representatives. Annals of Family Medicine3, 82-85.
Charles, C., Gafni, A. & Whelan, T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44, 681-692.
Domenighetti, G., D’Avanzo, B., Egger, M., Berrino, F., Pernegerm, T. & Mosconi, P. (2003). Women’s perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries. International Journal of Epidemiology 32, 816-821.
Edwards, A. & Elwyn, G. (2000). How should ‘effectiveness’ of risk communication to aid patients’ decisions be judged? A review of the literature. Medical Decision Making 19, 428-434.
Egger, M., Bartlett, C. & Juni, P. (2001). Are randomised controlled trials in the BMJ different? British Medical Journal 323, 1253.
Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Kinnersley, P. & Grol, R. (2000). Shared decision-making and the concept of equipoise: defining the ‘competences’ of involving patients in health care choices. The British Journal of General Practice50, 892-899.
Emanuel, E. & Emanuel, L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association267, 2221-2224.
Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Das Einmaleins der Skepsis. Über den richtigen Umgang mit Zahlen und Risiken. Berlin: Berliner Taschenbuch Verlag.
Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M. & Woloshin, S. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest8, 53-96.
Quante, M. (2002). Personales Leben und menschlicher Tod. Personale Identität als Prinzip der biomedizinischen Ethik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Nida-Rümelin, J. (2005). Ethik des Risikos. In: Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung. Ein Handbuch. (ed. J. Nida-Rümelin), pp. 862-886. Second edition. Stuttgart: Kröner.
Gøtzsche, P. C. & Olsen, O. (2000). Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 355, 129-134.