Innovations in the delivery of primary care services using a software solution: the Mayo Clinic’s Generic Disease Management System
Keywords:Clinical decision support, clinical communication, innovation, Mayo Clinic, patient education, person-centered medicine, practice improvement, preventive services, primary care, software
AbstractDespite the availability of national guidelines, primary care physicians struggle to provide evidence-based preventive services and to care for patients with chronic conditions. There are multiple reasons for this difficulty including time pressures and lack of technological solutions that support workflow. In collaboration with the Mayo Clinic Center for Innovation, we designed and developed a patient-centric software application that supports the needs of primary care physicians, allied health staff and patients. Patient and provider input was gathered and the software was designed to provide recommendations in a format for providers and in a patient-friendly version based upon the same data and guidelines. A satisfaction survey of patients was strongly positive. The software solution was accepted by primary care physicians and the allied staff and facilitated adherence to guidelines and quality measures. This supports the premise that patient-centered care can be enabled by software solutions developed with an understanding of workflow and the needs of clinicians and patients.
Chaudhry, R., Scheitel, S.M., McMurtry, E.K., Leutink, D.J., Cabanela, R.L., Naessens, J.M., Rahman, A.S., Davis, L.A. & Stroebel, R.J. (2007). Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine 167 (6) 606-611.
Dolan, P.W. (2009). Mayo Clinic Launches PHR. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/05/11/bisd0513.htm.
Dexheimer, J.W., Talbot, T.R., Sanders, D.L., Rosenbloom, S.T. & Aronsky, D. (2008). Prompting clinicians about preventive care measures: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 15 (3) 311-320.
Nielen, M.M., Schellevis, F.G. & Verheij, R.A. (2009). Inter-practice variation in diagnosing hypertension and diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in general practice. BMC Family Practice 10, 6.
Mays, N. (2011). Reducing unwarranted variations in healthcare in the English NHS. British Medical Journal 342 (7799) 665.
de Jong, J., Groenewegen, P.P., Spreeuwenberg, P., Westert, G.P. & de Bakker, D.H. (2009). Do decision support systems influence variation in prescription? BMC Health Services Research 9 (1) 20.
Hunt, V.L., Chaudhry, R., Stroebel, R.J. & North, F. (2011). Does pre-ordering tests enhance the value of the periodic examination? Study Design-Process implementation with retrospective chart view. BMC Health Services Research 11, 216.
Chaudhry, R., Tulledge-Scheitel, S.M., Parks, D.A., Angstman, K.B., Decker, L.K. & Stroebel, R.J. (2012). Use of a Web-based clinical decision support system to improve abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in a primary care practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3) 666-670.
Eaton, J., Reed, D., Angstman, K.B., Thomas, K., North, F., Stroebel, R., Tulledge-Scheitel, S.M. & Chaudhry, R. (2012). Effect of visit length and a clinical decision support tool on abdominal aortic aneurysm screening rates in a primary care practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (3) 593-598.
Dejesus, R.S., Angstman, K.B., Kesman, R., Stroebel, R.J., Bernard, M.E., Scheitel, S.M., Hunt, V.L., Rahman, A.S. & Chaudhry, R. (2012). Use of a clinical decision support system to increase osteoporosis screening. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (1) 89-92.